Drug Levels Associated With Optimal Discrimination Between Remission and Nonremission and Comparison of Antibody Assays During First Year of Stable Infliximab Maintenance Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: To implement therapeutic drug monitoring-based strategies for infliximab (IFX) in inflammatory bowel disease, the authors assessed IFX levels for optimal discrimination between remission and nonremission and compared assays for anti-IFX antibodies (Abs). METHODS: The retrospective cohort comprised 163 bionaive patients with inflammatory bowel disease who received stable IFX maintenance therapy (5 mg/kg every 8 weeks [q8w]) for 1 year. The clinical and biochemical remission status was assessed at all infusions (weeks 14-22-30-38-46-54), and IFX and anti-IFX Abs were estimated using a time-resolved fluorometric assay (n = 690; 88% of infusions). Samples positive for anti-IFX Abs or IFX levels < limit of detection (n = 102) were analyzed by 2 binding assays [enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)] and functional reporter gene assay/drug-tolerant enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: At all assessed time points, IFX levels were more than double in patients presenting clinical or biochemical remission. An IFX concentration of 4.5 mcg/mL was associated with clinical remission during the entire first year of therapy [sensitivity 54% (49-59), specificity 73% (67-78), AUCROC 0.65 (0.60-0.69), P < 0.0001]; these values were comparable with biochemical remission. Exploratory assessments for endoscopic remission (n = 131) were performed at the discretion of the treating physician. Anti-IFX Abs were associated with undetectable IFX and treatment failure [OR 2.9 (1.4-6.0), P < 0.01], irrespective of persistency or transiency. All performed assays detected anti-IFX Abs were picked up by all assays in ∼2/3 of samples. Binding assays demonstrated a higher sensitivity to anti-IFX Abs. CONCLUSIONS: IFX at ∼5 mcg/mL was associated with clinical and biochemical remission during the first year of maintenance therapy. During this phase of therapy, standard binding assays are appropriate for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Infliximab clearance decreases in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab therapy during pregnancy in inflammatory bowel disease is challenged by a dilemma between maintaining adequate maternal disease control while minimizing fetal infliximab exposure. We investigated the effects of pregnancy on infliximab pharmacokinetics. METHODS: The study population comprised 23 retrospectively identified pregnancies. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease were generally in clinical remission at pregnancy conception (74%) and received steady infliximab maintenance therapy (5 mg/kg q8w n = 17; q6w n = 4; q10w n = 1; 10 mg/kg q8w n = 1). Trough blood samples had been obtained in the same patients prior to pregnancy (n = 119), the first trimester (n = 16), second trimester (n = 18), third trimester (n = 7), and postpregnancy (n = 12). Data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic modeling. RESULTS: Dose-normalized infliximab concentrations were significantly higher during the second trimester (median 15 mg/ml/kg, interquartile range 10-21) compared to prepregnancy (7, 2-12; p = 0.003), the first trimester (9, 1-12; p = 0.04), or postpregnancy (6, interquartile range 3-11; p > 0.05) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Similar trends were observed in the third trimester (13, 7-36; p > 0.05). A one-compartment model with linear elimination described the pharmacokinetics of infliximab (volume of distribution n = 18.2 L; clearance 0.61 L/day). Maternal infliximab exposure was influenced by the second and third trimester of pregnancy and anti-infliximab antibodies, and not by pregnancy-imposed physiological changes in, for example, body weight or albumin. Infliximab clearance decreased significantly during the second and third trimesters by up to 15% as compared to pre- and postpregnancy and the first trimester. The increased maternal infliximab exposure was weakly associated with lowered clinical disease activity. Pharmacokinetic model simulations of virtual patients indicated the increased maternal infliximab trough concentrations imposed by pregnancy will not completely counteract the decrease in infliximab concentration if therapy is paused in the third trimester. CONCLUSION: Infliximab clearance decreases significantly in the second and third trimesters, leading to increasing maternal infliximab concentrations in any given regimen. Maternal infliximab levels may thus be maintained as constant in a de-intensified regimen by therapeutic drug monitoring guidance in inflammatory bowel disease.

Therapeutic thresholds and mechanisms for primary non-response to infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Primary non-response to infliximab (IFX) inherits a poor prognosis in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We explored underlying mechanisms and therapeutic thresholds in an effort to provide basis for optimizing therapy. METHODS: A prospectively followed cohort of 166 IBD patients having received standard IFX induction therapy (5 mg/kg at weeks 2, 6, and 14) had trough IFX and anti-IFX antibodies (Abs) retrospectively assessed at weeks 2 (n = 148) and 6 (n = 108). Circulating TNFα was measured in matched primary non-responders (n = 29) and responders (n = 21) at baseline and weeks 6 and 14. Clinical outcome at week 14 was supported by disease activity scores in half of patients. RESULTS: In all, 18 patients (11%) had primary non-response. Infliximab was consistently lower throughout the induction phase in non-responders as compared to responders (Week 2: IFX median 18.9 µg/mL vs. 23.3, p < .05. Week 6: 8.4 vs. 17.0, p < .05). Optimal IFX thresholds associated with response was 22.9 µg/mL at week 2 (sensitivity 51%, specificity 80%, AUCROC 0.67, p < .05) and 11.8 at week 6 (72%, 77%, 0.71, p < .05). Anti-IFX Abs occurred in 28% of primary non-responders and associated with low IFX and treatment failure (OR 13.7 [2.8-67.5], p < .01). Markers of disease activity (disease activity scores, albumin, CRP) also associated with low IFX. Circulating TNFα was higher throughout induction in non-responders with ulcerative colitis but not Crohn's disease. CONCLUSION: IBD patients with primary IFX failure generally have lower IFX trough than responders during early induction phase. Pharmacokinetic failure seems common in ulcerative colits, whereas pharmacodynamic failure appears common in Crohn's disease.

[Approval of new medicinal products - administrative procedures].

In this review, we discuss the approval of new medicinal products in Europe, which in particular for products with a new active substance is increasingly being approved through formalised collaboration between the member states of the European Union. The collaboration has resulted in a strengthening and harmonisation of the administrative procedures leading to approval of new medicinal products.

[Approval of new medicinal products - documentation requirements].

In this review, we discuss the approval of new medicinal products, which particularly for new products containing a new active substance is increasingly done in collaboration between the European countries. This collaboration has strengthened and harmonised the scientific basis for approval of new drugs in the EU.

Absence of Relationship Between Crohn's Disease Activity Index or C-Reactive Protein and Infliximab Exposure Calls for Objective Crohn's Disease Activity Measures for the Evaluation of Treatment Effects at Treatment Failure.

BACKGROUND: Circulating infliximab (IFX) concentrations correlate with clinical outcomes, forming the basis of the IFX concentration monitoring in patients with Crohn's disease. This study aims to investigate and refine the exposure-response relationship by linking the disease activity markers "Crohn's disease activity index" (CDAI) and C-reactive protein (CRP) to IFX exposure. In addition, we aim to explore the correlations between different disease markers and exposure metrics. METHODS: Data from 47 Crohn's disease patients of a randomized controlled trial were analyzed post hoc. All patients had secondary treatment failure at inclusion and had received intensified IFX of 5 mg/kg every 4 weeks for up to 20 weeks. Graphical analyses were performed to explore exposure-response relationships. Metrics of exposure included area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and trough concentrations (Cmin). Disease activity was measured by CDAI and CRP values, their change from baseline/last visit, and response/remission outcomes at week 12. RESULTS: Although trends toward lower Cmin and lower AUC in nonresponders were observed, neither CDAI nor CRP showed consistent trends of lower disease activity with higher IFX exposure across the 30 evaluated relationships. As can be expected, Cmin and AUC were strongly correlated with each other. Contrarily, the disease activity markers were only weakly correlated with each other. CONCLUSIONS: No significant relationship between disease activity, as evaluated by CDAI or CRP, and IFX exposure was identified. AUC did not add benefit compared with Cmin. These findings support the continued use of Cmin and call for stringent objective disease activity (bio-)markers (eg, endoscopy) to form the basis of personalized IFX therapy for Crohn's disease patients with IFX treatment failure.

Interactions Between Thiopurine Metabolites, Adalimumab, and Antibodies Against Adalimumab in Previously Infliximab-Treated Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Interactions between thiopurines and infliximab presumably contribute to superior effect of infliximab-thiopurine combination therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We examined whether principal cytotoxic thiopurine metabolites influence adalimumab (ADL) and anti-ADL antibodies (Abs). METHODS: Ninety-eight IBD patients previously treated with infliximab (96%) in whom trough ADL and anti-ADL Abs had been assessed as part of their clinical care were included. Thiopurine metabolites [6-thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGN) and methylated mercaptopurine metabolites (6-MeMP)] were determined at similar time points. RESULTS: ADL-thiopurine combination therapy was not associated with reduced anti-ADL Ab positivity compared to ADL monotherapy: 8/31 (26%) versus 19/67 (28%), p = 1.00. Concentrations of thiopurine metabolites were similar in anti-ADL Ab-positive and negative patients (6-TGN median 109 pmol/8 × 108 RBC vs. 112, p = 0.80; 6-MeMP 448 RBC vs. 720, p = 0.94). ADL trough levels did not differ between anti-ADL Ab-negative patients on ADL-thiopurine combination therapy and those on monotherapy (9.5 µg/mL vs. 7.6, p = 0.31). ADL levels were also comparable between patients on ADL mono- and combination therapy after stratification for 6-TGN/6-MeMP quartiles. There were no correlations between levels of 6-TGN and ADL (rP = - 0.17, p = 0.45; rS = - 0.38, p = 0.08), or 6-MeMP and ADL (rP = - 0.23, p = 0.31; rS = - 0.35, p = 0.11). Anti-ADL Ab positivity was associated with ADL treatment failure (OR 6 [2-20], p < 0.01). Higher trough ADL (9.6 µg/mL vs. 7.3, p < 0.05), but not concomitant thiopurine treatment, metabolite levels, or dosage, was associated with clinical remission. CONCLUSION: Effectiveness of ADL therapy associated with circulating ADL levels and anti-ADL Ab formation. In this study, there appeared no direct interactions between thiopurine metabolites and ADL or anti-ADL Abs.

A Role for Thiopurine Metabolites in the Synergism Between Thiopurines and Infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Interactions between principal cytotoxic thiopurine metabolites, that is 6-thioguanine nucleotides [6-TGN], and infliximab [IFX] and anti-IFX antibodies [Abs] may contribute to higher effectiveness of IFX-thiopurine combination therapy than monotherapies in inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: To examine if thiopurine metabolites influenced trough IFX and anti-IFX Abs, 89 patients previously assessed for anti-IFX Abs were included. To assess if IFX influenced thiopurine metabolites, eight patients who had responded to 12 weeks of intensified IFX at a constant thiopurine dosing were included. RESULTS: In the first cohort, IFX-thiopurine combination therapy reduced anti-IFX Ab detection [8/40; 20%] as compared with IFX monotherapy [22/49; 45%], odds ratio [OR] 0.31 [0.12-0.80], p < 0.05. 6-TGN was significantly lower in anti-IFX Ab-positive patients (50 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cells [RBC] vs 105, p < 0.01). All anti-IFX Ab-positive patients had 6-TGN < 117 pmol/8 × 108 RBC (sensitivity 100% [63-100], specificity 47% [29-65], area under the curveROC = 0.82, p < 0.01). Trough IFX was similar between anti-IFX Ab-negative patients in IFX monotherapy and IFX-thiopurine combination therapy [5.1 µg/mL vs 4.9, p = 0.76]. 6-TGN and IFX did not correlate [rP = 0.04, p = 0.83; rS = 0.02, p = 0.89, respectively]. In the second cohort, trough IFX increased during IFX intensification [ΔIFX median 6.5 µg/mL, p = 0.02], but 6-TGN was stable [6-TGN at Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12: 90 pmol/8 × 108 RBC, 93, 101, 90; p > 0.05]. Methylated mercaptopurine metabolite associations were consistently negative. CONCLUSIONS: Superior effect of IFX-thiopurine combination therapy over monotherapies partly relates to decrease in anti-IFX Abs, which associates with 6-TGN levels and has a lower therapeutic threshold than during thiopurine monotherapy. Additional benefit likely ascribes to synergy between different anti-inflammatory modes of action rather than direct drug interactions.

Outcomes After Primary Infliximab Treatment Failure in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Primary infliximab treatment failure is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and represents a challenge to clinicians. Treatment options are limited. This study assessed the prognosis, defined as surgery-free survival, in patients with primary infliximab treatment failure as compared to patients without primary failure (initial responders). Furthermore, this study assessed the specter of medical therapies used after primary infliximab treatment failure along with treatment outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective, observational, cohort study of patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with infliximab as first-line anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment at a tertiary center. Primary infliximab treatment failure was defined as no clinical improvement during infliximab induction therapy resulting in discontinuation of infliximab therapy. RESULTS: A total of 560 patients (Crohn's disease n = 353 and ulcerative colitis n = 207) were treated with infliximab. Among these, 81 (15%) had primary infliximab treatment failure after a median of 3 infusions (weeks 0, 2, and 6) (interquartile range 2-4). The median surgery-free survival was 196 days from first infusion. One year after primary infliximab treatment failure, the majority of patients (n = 51, 63%) had inflammatory bowel disease-related surgery (Crohn's disease n = 19, 58%; ulcerative colitis n = 32, 67%; P = 0.49). There was a markedly increased risk of surgery in patients with primary infliximab treatment failure as compared to initial responders: odds ratio 6.3 (3.8-10.6), P < 0.0001. Among 30 patients handled by medical therapies, 16 (53%) still had active disease 1 year after primary infliximab treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: Primary infliximab treatment failure is associated with poor outcome including high risk of surgery or sustained active disease despite medical interventions.

Magnitude of Increased Infliximab Clearance Imposed by Anti-infliximab Antibodies in Crohn's Disease Is Determined by Their Concentration.

Antibodies (Abs) against infliximab (IFX) increase IFX clearance and can result in treatment failure and acute hypersensitivity reactions. However, interpretation of their clinical value is complicated by individual differences in Ab responses and methods used for quantification. The increase in IFX clearance imposed by anti-IFX Abs has generally been evaluated using a binary classification, i.e., positive or negative. This analysis aimed to investigate if anti-IFX Ab concentrations provide a more adequate prediction of alterations in clearance. Data originated from a clinical trial on Crohn's disease patients with IFX treatment failure. The trial was not originally designed for pharmacokinetic analysis. Therefore, published pharmacokinetic models were utilized as priors to enable covariate investigation. The impact of anti-IFX Abs on clearance was assessed using different mathematical relationships and exploiting information from two different quantification assays, measuring semi-quantitative "total" or "unbound neutralizing" concentrations of anti-IFX Ab, respectively. Inclusion of anti-IFX Ab status/concentration improved the model's performance for all investigated relationships. The anti-IFX Ab concentrations were superior to the binary classifications, indicating that the magnitude of increase in IFX clearance imposed by anti-IFX Abs closely relates to their concentration. Furthermore, total anti-IFX Ab concentrations appeared superior to the unbound neutralizing fraction in identifying high clearance individuals. Simulations showed that even at low concentrations, anti-IFX Abs lead to sub-therapeutic IFX concentrations, supporting a need of treatment interventions in all anti-IFX Ab positive patients. The developed model can serve as a basis for further investigations to refine treatment recommendations for patients with anti-IFX Abs.

Optimizing Treatment with TNF Inhibitors in Inflammatory Bowel Disease by Monitoring Drug Levels and Antidrug Antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Biological tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and redefined treatment goals to include mucosal healing. Clinicians are faced with challenges such as inadequate responses, treatment failures, side effects, and high drug costs. The objective is to review optimization of anti-TNF therapy by use of personalized treatment strategies based on circulating drug levels and antidrug antibodies (Abs), i.e. therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Furthermore, to outline TDM-related pitfalls and their prevention. METHODS: Literature review. RESULTS: Circulating anti-TNF drug trough level is a marker for the pharmacokinetics (PK) of TNF inhibitors. Because of a number of factors, including antidrug antibodies, PK varies between and within patients across time leading to variable clinical outcomes. Differences in intestinal inflammatory phenotype influencing the pharmacodynamic (PD) responses to TNF inhibitors also affect treatment outcomes. As an alternative to handling anti-TNF-treated patients by empiric strategies, TDM identifies underlying PK and PD-related reasons for treatment failure and aids decision making to secure optimal clinical and economic outcomes. Although promising, evidence does not the support use of TDM to counteract treatment failure in quiescent disease. Use of TDM is challenged by methodological biases, difficulties related to differentiation between PK and PD problems, and temporal biases due to lack of chronology between changes in PK versus symptomatic and objective disease activity manifestations. Biases can be accommodated by knowledgeable interpretation of results obtained by validated assays with clinically established thresholds, and by repeated assessments over time using complimentary techniques. CONCLUSIONS: TDM-guided anti-TNF therapy at treatment failure has been brought from bench to bedside.

Circulating Cytokines and Cytokine Receptors in Infliximab Treatment Failure Due to TNF-α Independent Crohn Disease.

The inflammatory response at infliximab (IFX) treatment failure due to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α-independent Crohn disease activity is unknown. This is an exploratory, hypothesis-generating study based on samples collected in a clinical trial among patients failing conventional IFX dosages and treated with an intensified IFX regimen for 12 weeks. Patients with clinical response at week 12, as defined by a reduction of Crohn disease activity index by ≥70, were considered to suffer from nonimmune pharmacokinetic (PK) treatment failure (n = 18), and nonresponders had a presumed pharmacodynamic (PD) failure due to non-TNF-driven disease (n = 8). Patients failing IFX due to functional anti-IFX antibodies (n = 2) were excluded. The study population also comprised a group of 12 patients in long-term remission on IFX. A functional cell-based reporter gene assay was applied to measure IFX and anti-IFX antibodies. Circulating cytokines and cytokine receptors were assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interferon-γ, interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1ß, IL-1Ra, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, soluble TNF receptor (sTNF-R) 1, sTNF-R2, IL-17A, and monocyte chemotactic protein 1. The IFX levels were similar between patients with IFX failure caused by nonimmune PK or PD at treatment failure (median 1.4 vs 2.4 µg/mL; P = 0.52), during treatment intensification (8.1 vs 5.6; P = 0.85), and after 12 weeks (8.8 vs 7.7; P = 0.93), congruent with nonresponders failing IFX due to predominantly TNF-α-independent signaling pathways in their disease. Cytokine and cytokine receptor levels were comparable between patients with nonimmune PK failure and PD failure at time of manifestation of IFX failure, but with higher IL-6 and sTNF-R2 levels among IFX treatment failures as compared with patients in remission (IL-6 median 3.6 vs <3.1 pg/mL; P = 0.03; sTNF-R2 3207 vs 2547 pg/mL; P = 0.01). IL-6 and sTNF-R2 were lower after 12 weeks in nonimmune PK failures than in PD failures (<3.1 vs 4.0; P = 0.02; 3209 vs 4740; P = 0.04, respectively), and were measured at levels comparable with patients in remission. Further, trends of decreased IL-6 and sTNF-R2 levels among nonimmune PK failures during IFX intensification (P < 0.05 and P = 0.12) were observed. These observations indicate that IL-6 and sTNF-R2 are of potential relevance in driving the inflammatory response in IFX refractory Crohn disease caused by TNF-α-independent disease activity.

Time Course and Clinical Implications of Development of Antibodies Against Adalimumab in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Antibodies (Abs) against adalimumab (ADL) have been associated with low ADL levels and treatment failure. AIM: To characterize the temporal characteristics of anti-ADL Ab appearance and possible disappearance, and determine the clinical significance on drug efficacy and disease course. METHODS: Cohort study including inflammatory bowel disease patients in whom anti-ADL Abs had been assessed by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and, in case of disappearance, by enzyme immunoassay, and functional reporter gene assay. RESULTS: Anti-ADL Abs were evaluated in 133 serum samples from 72 patients. Seventeen patients (24%) tested positive after median of 194 days, interquartile range of 66 to 361. The proportion with anti-ADL Abs was 22% after 1 year, and 32% from 21 months onwards. Anti-ADL Abs generally persisted at repeat assessments during continued ADL therapy (n=8). Disappearance of anti-ADL Abs during therapy (n=3) was presumably caused by methodological biases due to detection of nonfunctional nonpersistent anti-ADL Abs by RIA, or false-negative measurement at reassessment by RIA and reporter gene assay. Anti-ADL Abs appeared pharmacologically active as judged by a median ADL concentration below limit of detection versus 7.4 µg/mL in anti-ADL Ab-negative samples (P<0.0001). Anti-ADL Abs associated with loss of response (odds ratio estimated 67, P<0.0001), and shorter treatment duration (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Abs against ADL appear in approximately one fourth of inflammatory bowel disease patients with decreasing frequency over time and usually within 1 year of therapy. Anti-ADL Abs generally persist during continued ADL therapy, and are associated with elimination of drug and treatment failure. Therefore, ADL cessation should be considered when anti-ADL Abs are detected and supported by clinical observations.

Implications of Infliximab Treatment Failure and Influence of Personalized Treatment on Patient-reported Health-related Quality of Life and Productivity Outcomes in Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the effects of infliximab (IFX) treatment failure on patient-reported outcomes and explored the influence of using personalized treatment in this situation. METHODS: Sixty-nine Crohn's disease patients with IFX treatment failure were randomized to an intensified IFX regimen (n = 36) or personalized treatment defined by IFX and anti-IFX antibodies (n = 33). Health-related quality of life evaluated with the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) and productivity evaluated with the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI:CD) were assessed at treatment failure and after 4, 8, 12 and 20 weeks. RESULTS: Median IBDQ score at manifestation of IFX treatment failure was 40 and improved markedly in responders by 11 at weeks 4 and 8 (p < 0.001) and by 13 at weeks 12 and 20 (p < 0.001). Non-responders improved modestly at weeks 12 and 20 (increase of median 4, p < 0.05). Overall activity impairment was high at IFX failure (median 70%) and decreased substantially in responders (40-50%, p < 0.001) and to a lesser extent in non-responders (15-40%, p < 0.05). In employed patients (55%), absenteeism was negligible during the entire study period. However, median presenteeism was 40% at manifestation of IFX failure and decreased only among responders across time (decrease 10-30%, p < 0.05). Although anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy was discontinued in most patients handled by personalized treatment, IBDQ and WPAI:CD scores were similar in these patients compared with patients routinely dose-intensified on IFX. CONCLUSION: Regaining low disease activity after IFX failure is necessary for minimizing patient impairment and indirect disease-related costs. A personalized treatment strategy does not have a negative influence on patient-reported outcomes.

Systematic Information to Health-Care Professionals about Vaccination Guidelines Improves Adherence in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Anti-TNFα Therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Implementation of guidelines for prevention of infectious diseases during anti-TNFα therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is important but difficult. We investigated whether systematic information to health-care professionals about these guidelines improves patients' adherence. METHODS: The study comprised three parts: (1) cross-sectional evaluation of baseline vaccination status in all IBD patients in anti-TNFα therapy (reference group; n=130); (2) prospective interventional study, where health-care professionals received systematic oral and written information about vaccination guidelines at baseline and at 2-month intervals for 6 months, followed by reassessment of vaccination status (intervention group; n=99); (3) cross-sectional evaluation of representative gastroenterologists' knowledge of guidelines (n=53). Outcomes were assessed by validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Patients' adherence to vaccination guidelines increased significantly after a period of systematic information to health-care professionals. Hence, complete adherence increased from 5 to 26%, partial adherence from 38 to 56%, and complete non-adherence decreased from 57 to 18% (P<0.0001). Adherence to all individual vaccinations except human papilloma virus increased significantly (P≤0.0021). Improvement was independent of disease type and anti-TNFα agent. At baseline, only 8% of physicians could identify all elements in the reference guideline. Additional barriers reported by physicians were forgetfulness (32%) and insufficient consultation time (26%). Patient-perceived barriers were costs of vaccinations (35%) and forgetfulness (25%). CONCLUSIONS: Gastroenterologists' limited knowledge of vaccination guidelines during anti-TNFα therapy can be overcome by systematic education of health-care professionals. This inexpensive and easily accessible intervention immediately results in markedly improved patient adherence. Remaining obstacles for adherence comprise high vaccination costs and forgetfulness.

Individualized Therapy Is a Long-Term Cost-Effective Method Compared to Dose Intensification in Crohn's Disease Patients Failing Infliximab.

BACKGROUND: In Crohn's disease patients failing infliximab therapy, interventions defined by an algorithm based on infliximab and anti-infliximab antibody measurements have proven more cost-effective than intensifying the infliximab regimen. AIM: This study investigated long-term economic outcomes at the week 20 follow-up study visit and after 1 year. Clinical outcomes were assessed at week 20. METHODS: Follow-up from a 12-week, single-blind, clinical trial where patients with infliximab treatment failure were randomized to infliximab intensification (5 mg/kg every 4 weeks) (n = 36), or algorithm-defined interventions (n = 33). Accumulated costs, expressed as mean costs per patient, were based on the Danish National Patient Registry. RESULTS: At the scheduled week 20 follow-up study visit, response and remission rates were similar in all study subpopulations between patients treated by the algorithm or by infliximab intensification. However, the sum of healthcare costs related to Crohn's disease was substantially lower (31 %) for patients randomized to algorithm-based interventions than infliximab intensification in the intention-to-treat population: $11,940 versus $17,236; p = 0.005. For per-protocol patients (n = 55), costs at the week 20 follow-up visit were even lower (49 %) in the algorithm group: $8,742 versus $17,236; p = 0.002. Figures were similar for patients having completed the 12-week trial as per protocol (50 % reduction in costs) (n = 45). Among patients continuing the allocated study intervention throughout the entire 20-week follow-up period (n = 29), costs were reduced by 60 % in algorithm-treated patients: $7,056 versus $17,776; p < 0.001. Cost-reduction percentages remained stable throughout one year. CONCLUSION: Economic benefit of algorithm-based interventions at infliximab failure is maintained throughout 1 year.

Changes in serum trough levels of infliximab during treatment intensification but not in anti-infliximab antibody detection are associated with clinical outcomes after therapeutic failure in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intensification of the infliximab (IFX) regimen is recommended if the treatment effect is inadequate. However, the rationale for this is not well defined as the underlying mechanisms vary. The aim of this study was to explore the association between changes in serum IFX and anti-IFX antibodies (Abs) after IFX intensification and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial including 42 Crohn's disease patients with IFX treatment failure, all treated with an intensified IFX regimen (5mg/kg every 4 week) for 12 weeks. Trough serum IFX and anti-IFX Ab concentrations were measured by a homogeneous mobility shift binding assay (HMSA) and a functional cell-based reporter gene assay (RGA) at treatment failure and the end of the trial. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (50%) regained clinical response on the intensified IFX regimen. The increase in serum trough levels of IFX during treatment intensification was higher among responders than non-responders (RGA, 8.8 versus 3.0 µg/mL, p = 0.035; HMSA, 9.9 versus 4.7 µg/mL, p = 0.040), and differentiated patients by clinical outcome (RGA, area under receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.75 [0.53-0.97], p = 0.035; HMSA, AUC 0.74 [0.53-0.95], p = 0.042). All responders exhibited an IFX increase ≥2.6 µg/mL (sensitivity 100%, specificity 50%). Anti-IFX Abs detected by HMSA in 13 patients (32%) were often non-functional and became undetectable during IFX intensification. However, even functional anti-IFX Abs detected by RGA in six patients (15%) became undetectable. CONCLUSION: Increase in IFX levels following treatment intensification was associated with improved clinical outcomes, indicating insufficient drug levels in a subgroup of patients. Anti-IFX Abs may become undetectable during treatment intensification, suggesting lowered production or the formation of immune complexes.